Jay Bharat twitter Light Mode
Login to upload, edit, or delete media.
Home Rich Text Editor modeaHome Light modeb
Q1 Financial Performance Analysis
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
Performance Category |
Analysis |
|
Cello World |
• Net Profit: ₹730M vs ₹826M (YoY) ↓<br>• Revenue: ₹5.29B vs ₹5B (YoY) ↑ |
GOOD |
Revenue growth positive but profit declined. Mixed signals. |
|
Indian Hotels |
• Acquiring 51% stake in Ank Hotels for ₹1.10B<br>• Acquiring 51% stake in Pride Hospitality for ₹940M |
VERY GOOD |
Strong expansion strategy with major acquisitions. Growth-focused. |
|
ESAB India |
• Net Profit: ₹409M vs ₹445M (YoY) ↓<br>• Revenue: ₹3.5B vs ₹3.3B (YoY) ↑ |
GOOD |
Revenue growth but slight profit decline. Stable performance. |
|
Marathon NextGen Realty |
• EBITDA: ₹309M vs ₹529M (YoY) ↓<br>• EBITDA Margin: 21.96% vs 32.63% (YoY) ↓ |
BAD |
Significant decline in both EBITDA and margins. Concerning trend. |
|
WIM Plast |
• Net Profit: ₹169M vs ₹145.1M (YoY) ↑<br>• Revenue: ₹899M vs ₹903M (YoY) ↓ |
GOOD |
Profit growth despite slight revenue decline. Improved efficiency. |
|
Praj Industries |
• Order Book: ₹3,254 Crore<br>• Expanding into SAF, CBG, and engineering exports<br>• Debt-free sustainable expansion |
VERY GOOD |
Strong order book, diversification strategy, and debt-free status. |
|
Allcargo Terminals |
• EBITDA: ₹346M vs ₹300M (YoY) ↑<br>• EBITDA Margin: 18.48% vs 15.83% (YoY) ↑ |
VERY GOOD |
Strong growth in both EBITDA and margins. Solid operational improvement. |
|
Brigade Hotel Ventures |
• Plans to double portfolio to 3,300 rooms<br>• Expanding in luxury and upper-midscale markets<br>• Focus on sustainability |
VERY GOOD |
Aggressive expansion plans with strategic focus. Growth-oriented. |
|
RPP Infra Projects |
• EBITDA: ₹200M vs ₹250M (YoY) ↓<br>• EBITDA Margin: 5.76% vs 7.44% (YoY) ↓ |
BAD |
Declining EBITDA and margins. Operational challenges evident. |
|
Embassy Developments |
• Net Loss: ₹1.66B vs Profit ₹1.2B (YoY) ↓<br>• Revenue: ₹6.8B vs ₹4.9B (YoY) ↑ |
VERY BAD |
Massive swing from profit to loss despite revenue growth. Major concerns. |
Performance Summary
Very Good (4 companies)
· Indian Hotels, Praj Industries, Allcargo Terminals, Brigade Hotel Ventures
Good (3 companies)
· Cello World, ESAB India, WIM Plast
Bad (2 companies)
· Marathon NextGen Realty, RPP Infra Projects
Very Bad (1 company)
· Embassy Developments
Key Observations
1. Hotel/Hospitality Sector: Shows strong performance with expansion strategies
2. Infrastructure/Real Estate: Mixed results with some significant challenges
3. Industrial/Manufacturing: Generally stable with modest growth
4. Revenue vs Profit Disconnect: Several companies showing revenue growth but profit challenges
Performance Classification Table
|
Company |
Performance Category |
Key Metrics |
Reasoning |
|
Tilaknagar Industries |
Very Good |
Profit: +121% YoY, Revenue: +30% YoY |
Exceptional profit growth with strong revenue increase |
|
Heubach Colorants |
Very Good |
Profit: +229% YoY, Revenue: +21% YoY |
Outstanding profit jump with solid revenue growth |
|
Time Technoplast |
Good |
Profit: +20% YoY, Revenue: +8% YoY, EBITDA: +12% YoY |
Consistent growth across all metrics, plus bonus shares |
|
Websol Energy Systems |
Good |
600 MW expansion, high ROE, leading margins |
Strong expansion with solid fundamentals |
|
KNR Constructions |
Good |
15-20% growth target, ₹6,963 cr order book, debt-free |
Strong order book and financial position |
|
Krsnaa Diagnostics |
Good |
Aggressive expansion plan, targeting double-digit growth |
Ambitious expansion strategy |
|
Bata India |
Neutral/Good |
Positive consumption outlook |
Forward-looking positive sentiment |
|
Titagarh Rail Systems |
Bad |
Profit: -40% YoY, Revenue: -25% YoY |
Significant decline in both profit and revenue |
Q1 Earnings Performance Analysis
|
Company |
Category |
Key Metrics |
Performance Summary |
|
Shaily Engineering Plastics |
VERY GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Revenue: ₹2.45B vs ₹1.79B (+37% YoY)<br>• EBITDA: ₹683M vs ₹354M (+93% YoY)<br>• EBITDA Margin: 27.7% vs 19.75% (+8pp) |
Outstanding growth across all metrics. Massive EBITDA growth with significant margin expansion |
|
VST Tillers Tractors |
VERY GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Net Profit: ₹446M vs ₹228M (+96% YoY) |
Exceptional profit growth - nearly doubled year-over-year |
|
Websol Energy System |
VERY GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Revenue: ₹2.2B vs ₹1.12B (+96% YoY) |
Outstanding revenue growth - nearly doubled |
|
Enviro Infra Engineers |
GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Revenue: ₹2.4B vs ₹2.05B (+17% YoY) |
Solid steady growth in revenue |
|
MAN Industries |
GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Net Profit: ₹276M vs ₹191M (+45% YoY)<br>• Revenue: ₹7.4B vs ₹7.49B (-1% YoY)<br>• EBITDA Margin: 6.62% vs 5.04% (+1.6pp) |
Good profit growth and margin improvement despite flat revenue |
|
Lodha Developers |
NEUTRAL ⭐⭐⭐ |
• NCD Limit: ₹30B → ₹50B |
Corporate action - expanding debt capacity (could be positive for growth funding) |
|
Exicom Tele Systems |
VERY BAD ❌❌❌ |
• Net Loss: ₹831M vs Profit ₹182M<br>• Revenue: ₹2.05B vs ₹2.5B (-18% YoY)<br>• EBITDA Loss: ₹386M vs Gain ₹248M |
Complete turnaround to losses with declining revenue and negative EBITDA |
Performance Summary:
· VERY GOOD (3 companies): Exceptional growth metrics
· GOOD (2 companies): Solid positive performance
· NEUTRAL (1 company): Corporate action
· VERY BAD (1 company): Significant deterioration
Very Good Performance
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
|
PATEL ENGINEERING |
Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹810M vs ₹547M (YoY) |
|
DHUNSERI VENTURES |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹835M vs ₹410M (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 48.12% vs 25.4% (YoY) |
|
TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹1.46B vs ₹1.02B (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 38.88% vs 24.86% (YoY) <br> Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹918M vs ₹554M (YoY) <br> Q1 Revenue: ₹3.75B vs ₹4.1B (YoY) |
|
AWFIS SPACE SOLUTIONS |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹1.27B vs ₹791M (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 37.82% vs 30.69% (YoY) |
|
SJVN |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹7.42B vs ₹6.7B (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 80.9% vs 76.7% (YoY) |
Good Performance
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
|
KAMDHENU |
Q1 SL Net Profit: ₹214M vs ₹154M (YoY) <br> Q1 Revenue: ₹1.96B vs ₹1.8B (YoY) |
|
BEML |
Q1 EBITDA Loss: ₹480M vs Loss ₹500M (YoY) (Reduced loss) |
Bad Performance
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
|
KIRI INDUSTRIES |
Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹101M vs ₹922M (YoY) |
|
ASTRAL |
Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹811M vs ₹1.2B (YoY) <br> Q1 Revenue: ₹13.6B vs ₹13.84B (YoY) |
|
Company / News |
Q1 Performance Summary |
Category |
|
El Cid Investments |
Net Profit ₹706M vs Loss ₹195M, Revenue ₹920M vs -₹175M |
Very Good |
|
TVS Supply Chain Solutions |
Net Profit ₹712M vs ₹75M, Revenue ₹25.9B vs ₹25.4B |
Very Good |
|
Fusion Finance |
Net Loss ₹922.5M vs Loss ₹356.2M, Revenue ₹4.22B vs ₹6.21B |
Very Good* (improved loss) |
|
Banco Products |
EBITDA ₹1.9B vs ₹1.3B, Margin 20.50% vs 16.52% |
Very Good |
|
Trump Statement |
Says Russia-Ukraine War might end soon |
Very Good |
|
ASM Technologies |
Net Profit ₹156M vs ₹31M, Revenue ₹1.23B vs ₹526M, EBITDA ₹257M vs ₹38M, Margin 20.91% vs 7.30% |
Very Good |
|
AFCONS Infrastructure |
Net Profit ₹1.36B vs ₹1.03B (YoY), Revenue ₹33.6B vs ₹31.3B, EBITDA ₹4.34B vs ₹3.67B, Margin 12.91% vs 11.73% |
Good |
|
Camlin Fine Sciences |
Net Loss ₹100M vs Loss ₹340M, Revenue ₹4.23B vs ₹3.8B |
Good |
|
Star Cement |
Net Profit ₹985M vs ₹310M |
Good |
|
Ramco Systems |
Net Profit ₹9.4M vs Loss ₹197M, Revenue ₹1.61B vs ₹1.36B, EBITDA ₹290M vs ₹34.4M, Margin 18.01% vs 2.51% |
Good |
|
Vindhya Telelinks |
Net Profit ₹586M vs ₹294M, Revenue ₹9.1B vs ₹8.3B |
Good |
|
Market Activity |
FII Buy ₹1,932.81 Cr, DII Buy ₹7,723.66 Cr |
Good |
|
Sharda Motor Industries |
Net Profit ₹999M vs ₹768M, Revenue ₹7.56B vs ₹6.85B |
Good |
|
Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals |
EBITDA ₹1.16B vs ₹738M, Margin 10.55% vs 7.55% |
Good |
|
Mishtann Foods |
EBITDA ₹842M vs ₹731M, Margin 21.81% vs 19.09% |
Good |
|
Max Estates |
Net Profit ₹114M vs ₹16M, Revenue ₹515M vs ₹405M |
Good |
|
Yatra Online |
EBITDA ₹231M vs ₹46M, Margin 11% vs 4.55% |
Good |
|
Manappuram Finance |
Interim Dividend ₹0.50/share |
Bad |
|
Grasim Industries |
Net Loss ₹1.2B vs Loss ₹521M |
Bad |
|
Wockhardt |
Net Loss ₹900M vs Loss ₹140M |
Bad |
|
Equitas Small Finance Bank |
Net Loss ₹2.2B vs Profit ₹258M |
Bad |
|
ImagicaaWorld Entertainment |
EBITDA ₹661M vs ₹1.08B, Margin 48.12% vs 60.28% |
Bad |
|
Shipping Corporation of India |
EBITDA ₹4.9B vs ₹5.1B, Margin 37.16% vs 33.66%, Net Profit ₹3.54B vs ₹2.9B, Revenue ₹13B vs ₹15B |
Bad |
|
Manappuram Finance |
Net Profit ₹1.38B vs ₹5.55B, Revenue ₹22.62B vs ₹24.9B |
Very Bad |
|
Puravankara |
Net Loss ₹684M vs ₹154M, Revenue ₹5.2B vs ₹6.6B |
Very Bad |
